| Peer-Reviewed

Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly

Received: 13 June 2022    Accepted: 4 July 2022    Published: 24 August 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Protein baiting has always been an essential component of fruit fly eradication programmes following detection of a breeding population in New Zealand. In 2015, a breeding population of Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) was successfully eradicated in Grey Lynn, Auckland after implementing a baiting programme. Although the baiting programme appeared to be successful at the time, improvements were sought in terms of better adhesion and retention of bait spots on foliage, reduction of bait application volume of individual spots, reduction in off target drift and safety improvements without compromising bioefficacy. At the time, concerns were raised by regulatory authorities and members of public in urban areas on the reliance on a single insecticide, as well as on the low viscosity of the bait mix. These concerns needed to be addressed to maintain regulatory and social licenses to undertake bait application in future responses. In order to improve the viscosity of the bait solution, a xanthan gum-based additive (keltrol) was added to the bait formulation (natflav) mix and tested with both the incumbent insecticide (fipronil) and a relatively new insecticide (spinetoram) to optimise efficacy and longevity of the insecticides against Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (DIPTERA: Tephritidae). Results showed that keltrol significantly enhanced the bioefficacy through significant increases in the uptake of insecticide via oral route and that spinetoram at twice the label rate could be considered as a useful and safer alternative to Fipronil in protein bait mixes.

Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16
Page(s) 178-184
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Queensland Fruit Fly, Protein Bait Application, Bioefficacy, Eradication Response, Fipronil, Spinetoram, Keltrol Gel, Xanthan Gum

References
[1] Mo J, Dominiak BC, Stevens MM, Reynolds OL 2014. Pest behaviour insights from quarantine surveillance of male Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Crop Protection 62: 55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.04.005.
[2] Bateman MA 1991. The impact of fruit flies on Australian horticulture. Horticultural Policy Council Report No. 3. ISBN 0642161100.
[3] Dominiak BC 2011. Review of grapes Vitis sp. as an occasional host for Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Crop Protection 30 (8): 958-961 doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.02.028.
[4] Dominiak BC, Ekman JH 2013. The rise and demise of control options for fruit fly in Australia. Crop Protection 51: 57-67.
[5] MPI (Ministry of Primary Industries) 2014. Queensland Fruit Fly (QFF) - Pathway Report. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/queensland-fruit-fly/qff-pathway-report.pdf. Accessed on 9 November 2016.
[6] KVH (Kiwifruit Vine Health) 2014. Financial impact of a fruit fly incursion to New Zealand's kiwifruit industry March 2014. http://www.kvh.org.nz/vdb/document/98983. Accessed on 9 November 2016.
[7] SriRamaratnam, R (1996) Fruit fly: a major threat to New Zealand’s fruit and vegetable industries? www.b3.net.nz/gerda/refs/24.pdf (accessed 22 November 2013).
[8] Rowland, M., Hackett, B. and Stribley, M. 1991. Evaluation of insecticides in field control simulators and standard laboratory bioassays against resistant and susceptible Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) from Sudan. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81: 189-199.
[9] Bellows, J. T. S. and Morse, J. G. 1993. Toxicity of insecticides used in citrus to Aphytismelitus Debach (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) and Rhizobius-lophanthae (Blaisd) (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Canadian Entomologist 125: 987-994.
[10] Cahill, M., Denholm, I., Ross, G., Gorman, K. and Johnston, D. 1996. Relationship between bioassay data and the simulated field performance of insecticides against susceptible and resistant adult Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Bulletin of Entomological Research 86: 109-116.
[11] Mahat, K. and Drew, R. A. I. 2015. Evaluation of Protein Bait Laced with Various Insecticides on the Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae): Attraction, Feeding, Mortality and Bait Persistence, Proceedings of XIIth International Citrus Congress (Eds. B. Sabater-Munoz et al.), Acta Horticulture 1065, ISHS.
[12] Saville D. J. 2015. Multiple Comparison Procedures—Cutting the Gordian Knot. Agronomy Journal 107: 730-735.
[13] Purea M., Putoa R., Munro E. 1997. Fauna of fruit flies in the Cook Islands and French Polynesia. In: Allwood AJ, Drew RAI, eds. Management of Fruit Flies in the Pacific. A Regional Symposium, Nadi, Fiji. ACIAR Proceedings, 76: 54-56.
[14] May, A. W. S. (1958). Fruit fly problem in southern and central Queensland. Queensland Agricultural Journal 81: 153-59.
[15] Edwards, B. A. B. 1961. The fruit fly problem in Australia. Outlook Agriculture. 3: 116–122.
[16] Fletcher, B. S. 1987. The biology of dacine fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 32: 115-144.
[17] Hancock D. L., Hamacek E. L., Lloyd A. C., Elson-Harris M. M. 2000. The distribution and host plants of fruit lies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Australia. Information Series Q199067. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland.
[18] Lloyd, A. 2004. Improved protein bait formulations for fruit fly control-Revised year 3 proposal HAL. Project no. AH00012.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Amin Khan Pathan, Dave Geoffrey Voice, Richard Arthur Ian Drew, Dave John Saville. (2022). Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Amin Khan Pathan; Dave Geoffrey Voice; Richard Arthur Ian Drew; Dave John Saville. Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(4), 178-184. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Amin Khan Pathan, Dave Geoffrey Voice, Richard Arthur Ian Drew, Dave John Saville. Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(4):178-184. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16,
      author = {Amin Khan Pathan and Dave Geoffrey Voice and Richard Arthur Ian Drew and Dave John Saville},
      title = {Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly},
      journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
      volume = {8},
      number = {4},
      pages = {178-184},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220804.16},
      abstract = {Protein baiting has always been an essential component of fruit fly eradication programmes following detection of a breeding population in New Zealand. In 2015, a breeding population of Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) was successfully eradicated in Grey Lynn, Auckland after implementing a baiting programme. Although the baiting programme appeared to be successful at the time, improvements were sought in terms of better adhesion and retention of bait spots on foliage, reduction of bait application volume of individual spots, reduction in off target drift and safety improvements without compromising bioefficacy. At the time, concerns were raised by regulatory authorities and members of public in urban areas on the reliance on a single insecticide, as well as on the low viscosity of the bait mix. These concerns needed to be addressed to maintain regulatory and social licenses to undertake bait application in future responses. In order to improve the viscosity of the bait solution, a xanthan gum-based additive (keltrol) was added to the bait formulation (natflav) mix and tested with both the incumbent insecticide (fipronil) and a relatively new insecticide (spinetoram) to optimise efficacy and longevity of the insecticides against Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (DIPTERA: Tephritidae). Results showed that keltrol significantly enhanced the bioefficacy through significant increases in the uptake of insecticide via oral route and that spinetoram at twice the label rate could be considered as a useful and safer alternative to Fipronil in protein bait mixes.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Development and Testing of Insecticide Bait Formulations for Enhanced Bioefficacy Against Queensland Fruit Fly
    AU  - Amin Khan Pathan
    AU  - Dave Geoffrey Voice
    AU  - Richard Arthur Ian Drew
    AU  - Dave John Saville
    Y1  - 2022/08/24
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16
    T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    SP  - 178
    EP  - 184
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7885
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220804.16
    AB  - Protein baiting has always been an essential component of fruit fly eradication programmes following detection of a breeding population in New Zealand. In 2015, a breeding population of Queensland fruit fly (Bactrocera tryoni) was successfully eradicated in Grey Lynn, Auckland after implementing a baiting programme. Although the baiting programme appeared to be successful at the time, improvements were sought in terms of better adhesion and retention of bait spots on foliage, reduction of bait application volume of individual spots, reduction in off target drift and safety improvements without compromising bioefficacy. At the time, concerns were raised by regulatory authorities and members of public in urban areas on the reliance on a single insecticide, as well as on the low viscosity of the bait mix. These concerns needed to be addressed to maintain regulatory and social licenses to undertake bait application in future responses. In order to improve the viscosity of the bait solution, a xanthan gum-based additive (keltrol) was added to the bait formulation (natflav) mix and tested with both the incumbent insecticide (fipronil) and a relatively new insecticide (spinetoram) to optimise efficacy and longevity of the insecticides against Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (DIPTERA: Tephritidae). Results showed that keltrol significantly enhanced the bioefficacy through significant increases in the uptake of insecticide via oral route and that spinetoram at twice the label rate could be considered as a useful and safer alternative to Fipronil in protein bait mixes.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ministry for Primary Industries, Rotorua, New Zealand

  • Ministry for Primary Industries, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • International Centre for the Management of Pest Fruit Flies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

  • Saville Statistical Consulting Limited, Lincoln, New Zealand

  • Sections